|
Introduction
Poverty is
widely agreed to be an unacceptable human condition yet it
remains an enduring problem. Despite broad agreement on the
adoption of comprehensive poverty alleviation programmes as
a key component in development strategies over the past
fifty years, almost half of the world’s population currently
lives on less than two dollars a day and the gaps between
the rich and the poor, amongst and within nations, are
perceived to continue to widen. Poverty, both a cause and an
effect of increasing social, economic and political divides,
is a problem that impacts not only the economic development
of nations, but also their political stability and
democratisation.
In November
2001, the Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats (CALD)
organised a conference on the political dimensions of
globalisation. This was an attempt to review the impact of
globalisation in the Asian region and to provide an
opportunity for participants to encounter a wide range of
views towards strategising appropriate responses.
Expressions of opposition to globalisation had focussed on
poverty and the “divide,” and it was expected that the
discussion at the conference would be substantially oriented
around these issues.
Due to the
September 11 terrorist attack on New York and Washington
D.C., however, the focus of the conference was substantially
shifted to political developments in the region in response
to the threat of terrorism, particularly its impact on
democracy and freedom in Asia. Indeed, the shift of focus
simply mirrored a general trend in which issues such as
poverty were displaced from the spotlight by
security-related issues, setting back the democratisation
process in Asia, as well as the commitment to poverty
alleviation.
Nonetheless,
even though the threat of terrorism has substantially
displaced poverty-related and development-related issues
from priority in the political agenda of nations and
international organisations, much discussion about terrorism
points to poverty as one of its roots. Thus, the focus of
this conference on “wealth creation and sustainable
development” reflects CALD’s recognition of the on-going
political importance of poverty in the Asian region.
There is
general recognition of the need for policies to overcome
poverty. The strategies and approaches to effect these
policies, however, have always been contentious and subject
to change as the past 50 years have revealed. In the 1950s
and 1960s, strategy often focussed on investments in
large-scale physical infrastructure projects while in the
1970s, it shifted to the development of human capital.
During the 1980s, the emphasis moved toward decentralized
decision-making, trade liberalisation and economic reform
while in more recent years, there has also been an increased
focus on the strategic importance of good governance. There
are rather distinct and competing ideological approaches to
overcoming poverty. Strategic approaches developed by
international institutions, too, are criticised as
donor-biased and insensitive to the culture of the intended
beneficiaries and unresponsive to their real needs. There
are also debates on how poverty is to be measured, how the
reduction of poverty is to be ascertained and how a poverty
alleviation program can be judged as a success or failure.
Conference
Objectives
CALD aims to
provide a unique forum for exchanging views about the
principles of liberal democracy and facilitating discussion
on appropriate responses to significant problems of the
region. Like earlier CALD conferences, this conference will
provide a forum for arriving at liberal solutions to
pressing problems.
Its general
objectives are:
·
to explore the dimension of poverty in Asia and
·
to consider liberal solutions for the alleviation of poverty
in the region.
Participants
Members of
parliament, officials of opposition and ruling political
parties, members of civil society and the media and
academics from across Asia, Europe and North America will
gather in this two-day conference to share ideas,
experiences and expertise.
Plenary
Session I
Economic
Growth and Income Inequalities:
An
Empirical Regional Survey
Background
Asia is
extremely diverse in culture but also in levels of economic
development. Although a number countries, particularly from
East and South East Asia, have achieved impressive growth
rates from the 70s to the 90s and achieved overall high
indicators with regard to living standards, despite the
financial crisis of 1997, the benefits are not necessarily
evenly spread while other countries have not shared in this
economic growth. Asia is still home to two-thirds of the
world’s poor.
This session
will present an economic overview of the state of economic
development in the East, South East and South Asian regions,
specifically the extent and depth of poverty in the
countries of these regions.
Questions to
be addressed by panellists:
Using current
qualitative and quantitative measures or indicators of
poverty, what is the state of poverty in East, South East
and South Asia?
Which countries
in the region have been able to reduce poverty during the
past decade and what are the policies that have enabled them
to do so?
Plenary
Session II
Development,
Freedom and Human Security
Background
Realising that
conflict, poverty, infectious diseases and human right
violations, which threaten the survival and dignity of
millions of people are not adequately addressed, the United
Nations Secretary General has called on the world community
to advance the twin goals of “freedom from want” and
“freedom from fear”, advocating the development of a new
human-centred approach to effectively and comprehensively
address these issues. In response to this, a UN Commission
on Human Security (CHS) was created, co-chaired by Mrs.
Sadako Ogata, former UN High Commissioner for Refugees and
Professor Amartya Sen, Nobel laureate for Economics and
assisted by ten distinguished Commissioners from around the
world. The goals of the Commission are:
-
to promote
public understanding, engagement and support of human
security and its underlying imperatives;
-
to develop
the concept of human security as an operational tool for
policy formulation and implementation, and
-
to propose a
concrete programme of action to address critical and
pervasive threats to human security.
In this
plenary, Commissioner Dr. Surin Pitsuwan will present his
views on human security, and the work and achievements to
date of the Commission.
Plenary
Session III
Contending
Paradigms of Sustainable Development
Background
Modern politics
is largely based on the struggle between followers of three
major ideological paradigms. In some cases, followers of one
or other ideology attempt to achieve power in the name of
that ideology, or in order to pursue policies in accordance
with that ideology. In other cases, political struggles
involve groups and individuals who are influenced to varying
degrees by different ideologies, to influence policy in the
direction of their ideological perspective. Changing
patterns and fashions in economic policies and poverty
alleviation strategies reflect, to some degree, variation
from one place to another and one time to another in the
relative political strength of one ideological view or
another.
In this
session, an overview will be presented of the liberal
paradigm in the context of the differences between the three
major competing ideologies: conservation, socialism and
liberalism.
Questions to
be addressed by panellists:
What are the
main differences of approach to national economic policy
between liberals, conservatives and socialists?
Where are good
examples of countries (and institutions) that have followed
liberal, conservative and socialist economic policies?
What are the
main points of liberal, conservative and socialist
approaches to alleviating poverty?
How do newer
approaches, such as that of “the Greens” or feminists
compare with the three major ideologies? Do they generate
substantially different policy approaches to dealing with
poverty?
Plenary
Session IV
Political
Parties and Economic Programmes
Background
Recognising the
importance of improving people’s welfare and achieving
improvement of their standards of living, political parties
regularly adopt an economic platform as the basis for
economic policy-making and appeals for electoral support in
their respective countries. This economic platform is an
integral part of the party’s image and programme and is
widely disseminated.
In this plenary
session, liberal and democratic parties from East, South
East and South Asia will present their parties’ economic
platforms in the context of the economic and political
situation in their respective countries.
Questions to
be addressed by panellists:
What are the
guiding principles and salient features of the economic
programmes of the political parties? What were the main
economic issues that determined the focus of the programme
How were these economic programmes arrived at?
How effectively
have the political parties been in pursuing these economic
programmes? What obstacles and difficulties were
encountered?
Plenary
Session V
Populism,
Political Opportunism and Ideological Dogmatism
Background
Political
parties compete with each other for the power to determine
national policies. On the one hand, they may compete on the
basis of their various claims to be best equipped to manage
the nation’s economic affairs. On the other, however sound a
party may believe its programme to be, if it cannot sell the
programme to voters, it cannot win power. The region overall
includes a wide variety of political contexts that makes the
adoption of sound economic management policies politically
hazardous. There are countries in which a single ideological
approach has come to seem exclusively ‘legitimate’, making
other ideological approaches “un-saleable,” however sound.
There are situations where continuing economic failure has
provided fertile ground for opportunistic parties willing to
play on the suffering of the people and there are situations
where because of economic downturn, clever marketing of
populist policies is able to win over claims to sound and
realistic, but painful, economic management.
In this
plenary, liberal and democratic parties will discuss their
encounters with populism, political opportunism and
ideological dogmatism and how it has affected their own
political fortunes.
Questions to
be addressed by panellists:
How did the
rise of these populists, opportunists or dogmatic ideologies
occur? What are the national issues they used to rally their
supporters?
To what extent
have these populists, opportunists or and dogmatic
ideologies determined political outcomes and influenced
national policies?
What steps were
taken by the political parties to counter populism,
opportunism and ideological dogmatism? Have they been
effective in meeting the challenge that these elements
present?
Plenary
Session VI
How to
create an enabling environment for growth and sustainable
development
Background
There is
substantial agreement, on the surface, concerning the need
to put poverty alleviation on top of any government’s
development programme. To implement such a programme,
however, requires a macroeconomic and national policy
environment, which not only supports it but also guarantees
its sustainability. This requires the creation or the
strengthening of institutions capable of implementing
programmes and monitoring their results.
In this
plenary, the speakers will discuss the institutionalisation
of such an environment congenial to growth and sustainable
development in terms of their experience in national
government, and in the field.
Questions to
be addressed by panellists:
What factors
pave the way for the creation of an enabling environment for
growth and sustainable development?
What roles will
political parties, as well as other players in national
policy making play in creating such an environment?
Concurrent Sessions
Stimulating
and Supporting Local Entrepreneurship
Central to the
liberal approach in addressing poverty is the establishment
of an environment that encourages the growth and development
of businesses, which would ensure the sustainable livelihood
and income of the populace. Although implemented in various
ways across and within countries, this approach has been
quite effective in a number of countries in Asia. In these
concurrent sessions, speakers will discuss specific cases
from various Asian countries of programmes aimed at
supporting the growth of businesses by developing or
improving access for entrepreneurs to capital, access to
markets, and access to education, training and technology.
Questions to
be addressed by panellists:
What was your
experience of improving access for entrepreneurs to capital,
market, education, training and technology?
What were the
results of these programmes?
What are the
best ways of developing an environment that supports the
growth of businesses?
Academic and
Political Synthesis
In this
session, experienced rapporteurs with developed views of
their own on the conference theme will summarise the
highlights of the conference and attempt to draw
conclusions.
Closing Keynote
Address
The closing
keynote address will focus on the economic programmes
pursued by the government of Sri Lanka and the results that
have been achieved in terms of improvement of the people’s
welfare. |